GreenLatinos is a National Coalition of Latino Environmental & Conservation Leaders

  • Read more
  • GreenLatinos has partnered with Sierra Club to release a post-election nationwide poll of Latino voters and their perspectives on critical environmental and conservation issues. 

    Latinos are cultural conservationists. Our belief that we are the stewards of our earth is not based on a membership, it is passed down from generation to generation as part of our proud heritage.  This poll affirms that Latinos' belief that we have 'a moral responsibility to take care of the earth' is virtually unanimous and that we expect our elected and appointed officials to maintain and enforce vital protections of our air, water, and climate.

    2016 Post-election Latinos and the Environment Survey - Memo

    2016 Post-election Latinos and the Environment Survey - Slide Deck

    2016 Post-election Latinos and the Environment Survey - Toplines

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  •  

    CLICK HERE TO TAKE ACTION IN SUPPORT OF THE STANDING ROCK SIOUX

    President Barack Obama Stand with Standing Rock!

    November 12, 2016

    Dear President Obama:

    We agree with you, and with our Native American sisters and brothers regarding the proposed Dakota pipeline that would run along sacred grounds at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation: “[T]here is a way for us to accommodate the sacred lands of Native Americans.”

    Indeed there is a way to respect the Sioux people and sacred grounds by guarding against the proposed pipeline. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers must withhold permits for the $3.7 billion Dakota Access pipeline because the pipeline would cross a navigable waterway. The Army Corps of Engineers emphasizes that permits and projects on navigable waterways including rivers need to comply with the President’s Executive Order 12898 on environmental justice and health. See Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restoration, Integrated Feasibility Report: Final Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Sept. 2015). The same reasoning applies to the proposed Dakota pipeline.

    The Order protects Native Americans against unjustified and unnecessary discriminatory impacts, as well as intentional discrimination, in permitting decisions by the Army Corps of Engineers. The Order requires the Corps to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities, including permitting decisions on Indian tribes and other minority and low income populations. Environmental justice concerns may arise, as they do here, from impacts on the natural and physical environment, including human health and ecological impacts, and from related social or economic impacts.

    What are the pipeline’s merits and its true costs, including the risk of harm to the sacred lands, with full and fair participation by Native Americans? Who would benefit from alternative routes, and who would be harmed?

    The Dakota and Lakota of the Standing Rock tribe at Standing Rock face the risk of grave damage to their sacred grounds and water supply from the proposed pipeline and permitting decision. No one else does. The proposed route threatens places that have been part of the Sioux’s ancestral lands since antiquity. Construction, leaks, and spills would damage their sites of deep cultural and historic significance, including burial grounds. The pipeline was shifted towards the tribe’s sacred lands, away from Bismarck, N.D., because federal regulators saw it as a potential threat to that city’s water supply. The threats cannot be shifted from the city to the Dakota and Lakota of the Standing Rock tribe.

    The pipeline would move half a million barrels of crude oil a day across the Plains. “But in a time of oil gluts and plummeting oil prices, is it worth it? Is it worth the degradation of the environment, the danger to the water, the insult to the heritage of the Sioux,” asks The New York Times. The answer is a resounding No!

    The threats to the sacred lands at Standing Rock reflect a history and pattern of discrimination against the Sioux. A national monument in the Black Hills of South Dakota lies not far away. The monument stands on sacred land, that land was stolen from the Sioux by the government and plundered for gold, and the monument celebrates the settlers who took so much of the Native American lives, culture, and land.

    Under President George W. Bush, the Secretary of the Navy and a Major General in the Marine Corps each wrote a letter against a proposed toll road project that would have devastated the Native American Acjachemen sacred site of Panhe and San Onofre State Beach in Southern California in 2010. The Secretary of Commerce upheld the decision to stop the project. The California Coastal Commission stopped the project in part becauase of the impact on Native Americans alone. The U.S. Army should stop the project along the Native American sacred grounds.

    Enough is enough. Please do not allow the proposed pipeline to threaten the Lakota and Dakota people and their sacred grounds at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The Army Corps of Engineers must deny any permit that threatens these values. Thank you.

    Very truly yours,

    Mark Magaña
    President & CEO GreenLatinos

    Robert García
    GreenLatinos Board Member
    Founding Director and Counsel, The City Project

    Robert (Bob) Bracamontes
    Yu-va’-tal ‘A’lla-mal (Black Crow)
    Acjachemen Nation, Juaneno Tribe

     

    GreenLatinos Letter to President Obama in Support of the Standing Rock Sioux